Editorial Policies
Peer Review Process
All articles submitted to Sri Lanka Journal of Radiology are initially assessed by an Editor, who decides whether or not the article is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable for peer review are assigned to one or more independent experts, who assess the article for clarity, validity, and sound methodology.
Sri Lanka Journal of Radiology operates a double-blind peer review process, meaning that authors and reviewers remain anonymous for the review process. The review period is expected to take around four weeks. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.
Based on the reviewer reports the editor will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance. Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal’s Editor-in-Chief, who is supported by an expert, international Editorial Board.
Section Policies
Leading Article
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Research Articles
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Case Reports
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Letters to the Editor
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Point of View
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Pictorial Essay
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Review Articles
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed